Copy of training blog graphic (1)

You should recommend mold testing when there is uncertainty about the presence, extent, or impact of mold — especially when there are health concerns, hidden moisture issues, or a need for third-party documentation. Mold testing is most valuable when the situation isn’t obvious and verification is needed to guide decisions or protect all parties involved.

Testing is especially helpful when occupants report respiratory symptoms, when there’s a persistent musty odor but no visible growth, or when moisture problems have been ongoing. It’s also commonly recommended after remediation as part of post-remediation verification, during real estate transactions, or when insurance or property managers require formal documentation. In these cases, testing provides clarity and confidence for everyone involved.

However, testing isn’t always necessary. If visible mold growth is already present, the priority should be correcting the moisture issue and performing proper remediation. In obvious situations, testing won’t change the scope of work and may add unnecessary cost and delays.

Ultimately, mold testing is a tool to reduce uncertainty — not a replacement for professional judgment. By recommending testing only when it adds value, contractors can build trust, protect their liability, and ensure projects are handled correctly from start to finish.

To see all the restoration and abatement solutions Aramsco offers, visit www.aramsco.com/restore

Have a blog topic you want us to discuss? Leave a comment below!